My article below as published on the Queensland Telegraph at . http://www.queenslandtelegraph.com/lack-of-report-cards-on-barrier-reef-health-a-concern/
http://www.greatbarrierreef.org.au/great-barrier-reef-fed-and-state-govt-crap-response-to-unesco/
The three massive LNG plants under construction on Curtis Island in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (construction much more advanced now). It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the effects on water quality in a once pristine waterway, and what was once hundreds of hectares of mangroves.
Heron Island, a popular international tourist destination off Gladstone.
Lack of report cards on Barrier Reef
health a concern
ENVIRONMENTALISTS
remain pessimistic that the Great Barrier Reef will be placed on the World
Heritage Committee’s in danger list, despite a new ultimatum to the State
and Federal Governments to take prompt action to protect it.
In an
interim report recently released, UNESCO gave both governments until next
February to convince it that effective measures were being taken to halt new
port developments and improve water quality.
Following
major concerns raised in a delegates’ mission report last March, the
international body said some progress had been made, but not enough to
demonstrate that the Reef’s outstanding universal value (OUV) was
protected.
Coastal
development and water quality issues in Gladstone were again highlighted,
together with proposed development at Port Alma and Balaclava Island.
When the
World Heritage Committee meets in Cambodia next month, it is expected to adopt
the new recommendation. This states that the Great Barrier Reef be included in
the List of World Heritage in Danger in 2014, ‘‘in the absence of a firm
and demonstrable commitment’’ from the state and federal governments to take
action.
UNESCO
referred to a draft Great Barrier Reef Ports Strategy released by the
Queensland Government last October which proposed to prevent “significant”
development outside existing port areas until 2022, but said this did not
restrict development to existing footprints of individual ports.
“According
to the strategy, development can occur in all areas identified in the land use
plans for each port,” UNESCO said.
“The World
Heritage Centre and IUCN received reports indicating that in recent years a
number of port boundaries were extended significantly to include areas of
significant habitat that contribute to OUV.
“They note
that the Queensland Deputy Premier’s media release announcing the draft Port
Strategy stated that future development would be possible ‘at several locations
such as Balaclava Island and Port Alma in the Port of Gladstone’.
“They also
note that both these locations are outside existing major port areas (40 to 50
km away from the port of Gladstone), in the relatively undeveloped Fitzroy
River delta, and that there is currently no development on Balaclava Island
that could justify its classification as an existing port area.”
It was also
critical of the lack of promised annual “report cards” on the Reef, pointing
out that so far only one had been published for 2009 as the baseline.
“…another
key concern is the lack of clarity about whether the negative trend in water
quality continues to be reduced and the positive signs of restoration are
maintained, as annual water quality report cards have not been published as
predicted. They recommend that the (World Heritage) Committee urge the
State Party to confirm a clear financial commitment by the Australian
Government to maintain the Reef Rescue program as a matter of urgency…”
In
response, Federal Environment Minister Tony Burke claimed the government had
already taken steps and would work with the WHC to protect the value of the
reef.
‘‘It’s one
of the most precious places on earth,’’ he said.
‘‘Some of
the recent announcements have not yet been incorporated into today’s
(UNESCO) report, such as a $200 million commitment to the next stage of Reef
Rescue.’’
But
according to Save the Reef spokesman Dr Andrew Jerimijenko, that was not nearly
enough. He told the Telegraph:
“It is like
getting a butterfly net to stop a plague of locusts. It is not going to
bring back the 50 percent of coral already lost, it is not going to even stop
us losing the next 50 percent in 10 years.
“ We need
something like the $12 billion given to save the Murray River.
“The Crown
of Thorns is being driven by sediment (dredge spoil feeds them). He has
to stop industry using the Great Barrier Reef as a dump. He has to stop
approving the industrialisation of the Reef, and he has to do this in less than
four months, because I can’t see (Opposition Environment spokesman) Greg Hunt
being any better.
“If I were
a betting man I would put money on a 2014 In Danger listing”.
Australians
for Animals coordinator Sue Arnold said the UNESCO warning indicated “the
same old story”.
“Both the
state and federal governments will allow the GBR World Heritage Area to be
destroyed in the name of economic development.
“Gillard’s
government is the most anti-environmental government in the history of this
country, only equalled by the crap coming out of the Newman ministers,” she
claimed.
However,
Queensland Environment Minister Andrew Powell is confident the reports required
of the State Government would be presented to UNESCO in time to avoid the
threatened in danger listing.
He said the
LNP government was already reviewing Gladstone Harbour and compiling a ports
strategy. It was already assessing the health of the Reef through the Great
Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority in cooperation with the Federal
Government.
By John
Mikkelsen
