Showing posts with label Kevin Rudd. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kevin Rudd. Show all posts

Friday, 23 August 2013

GetUp gets down and dirty!

Who's a misogynist?
GetUp is a misinformation body which evolved from the US (Partly George Soros Funded) MoveOn.

Although GetUp claims to be an independent grass roots organisation...
GetUp is an independent, grass-roots community advocacy organisation which aims to build a more progressive Australia by giving everyday Australians the opportunity to get involved and hold politicians accountable on important issues.
...everyday Australia's who are not of an extreme left bent cannot express their views.
GetUp does not back any particular party
Is your bulltish meter going wild in the background? Better throw a blanket over it! It will be going beserk and I progress!
GetUp does not accept donations from political parties or the Government. 
However it DOES accept wads of cash from the union movement. Do the union members know what happens to their contributions? (link)
In 2010 it became public that GetUp received more than $1m in donations from six unions in the course of three weeks during that year's federal election campaign, equal to about two thirds of its advertising campaign expenditure and over half of their total donations.
GetUp is run by a small office of staff, interns and volunteers in Sydney. Since July 2012, Sam McLean has acted as GetUp's National Director, replacing previous National Director Simon Sheikh.  
And Simon Sheikh's political affiliations?
Simon Sheikh was appointed national director of GetUp! in September 2008; four years later journalist Troy Bramston revealed that he had been a financial member of the Australian Labor Party for four years at the time of his appointment. He remained a member for another three months before resigning his membership. This was initially refuted by Sheikh but the General Secretary of theALP (NSW Branch), declared that party records show Sheikh was a financial member from 2 April, 2004, until the 26 November, 2008. 
GetUp's latter day National Director Sam McLean has sent out a begging letter wanting me to "chip in again." Sorry, Sam, since I didn't "chip in" last time, your again makes that impossible.

SO what does succor-seeking Sam say?
My family friend Kathy has voted Liberal all her life. Kathy's right. If we don't stand up for our progressive values....
Kathy's right? Progressive values from a fictitious person who has voted "Liberal all her life?"  No Kathy's not right! She's definitely left.

She was talking about Tony Abbott's views on women....
Tony Abbott's views on women? Remember,  former PM Gillard's  "Abbott's a misogynist" tirade was made when defending Peter Slipper and his relating womens' genitalia to mussels. (LINK)
Defending a misogynist by branding another a misogynist? Strange.

Does Abbott dislike women? He likes them, not like the lies spread about him that actually apply to his misogynist opponent. Ask the make-up artists, air crew and others. (link)

Ask all the Labor people who resigned on his return. (link)

Back to Sam's Fictional Friend:
And on refugees.
On Refugees? The coalition had a successful suite of policies that stopped the boats and stopped deaths at sea. Rudd opened the door and, as Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono said, put "sugar on the table." This lead to billions extra out of our borrowed dollars budget and tragically led to more than 1,300 deaths at sea. Shame, Rudd, Shame.

If we don't hold Rudd to account for his outlandish inappropriate waste spending it will be our Grandchildren, nay our great Grandchildren, who will be paying off this. What about the $5.4 million in $900 cheques including some that that went offshore this week to backpackers. (link)
In a major dent to Labor's economic credibility, the costly government bungle means taxpayers will fork out more than $5 million in "tax bonus" payments in 2013. 
A News Corp investigation can reveal hordes of backpackers on "working holiday" visas received the one-off cash bonus even though 5 million Australian workers missed out.
What about the lies spread by Rudd?

Abbott's $70 billion black hole? Exposed as a lie by the SMH. (Link)
The claim"The Coalition, to return the federal budget to as a good a position as the government's, at minimum, would have to make $70 billion worth of cuts."  
Politifact rates the statement "false". (Details at www.politifact.com.au

As health minister Tony Abbott "took $1 billion out of hospital funding for the states".

Kevin Rudd on Sunday, August 11, 2013 in the leaders' debate, National Press Club.

How did politfact rate this whopper?
The charge is serious and personal.
We rate it False. (link)
Abbott is a volunteer fire-fighter, a volunteer surf life saver and spends his holidays raising funds by his PolliePedal (link), often for women's causes; previously breast cancer and this year for Manly Women's Shelter (Misogynist?)
Since it began, Pollie Pedal has raised $2.5 million for organisations such as the Poche Centre for Indigenous Health within the Sydney Medical School at the University of Sydney, the Royal Flying Doctor Service, Ronald McDonald House, Youth Insearch, and the Paralympic Games, as well as medical research into childhood leukaemia, diabetes, breast cancer and prostate cancer.
Compare the two and really examine them, not relaying on left leaning media filters (crickey, ABC, SMH)  there is only one decent man and one rat.

Mind you, they are both bowing to the falsified man-made global warming hypothesis. Shame on them both.

In the Senate, why not vote for truth in Science, why not vote against paying billion to prop up the falsified man-made global warming hypothesis......Vote 1 -the NO CARBON TAX Climate Sceptics.

+  +  +  +  +  +  +  

Sam McLean and GetUp's latest lies:

To: xxxxxx
Subject: Tony wants to speak for us. Here's what he says

Dear X

My family friend Kathy has voted Liberal all her life. This weekend, over Sunday lunch, she asked me "how are we letting him get away with this?" 

She was talking about Tony Abbott's views on women. And on refugees. And on same sex couples, and "on, well, equality and compassion - full stop." 

Kathy's right. If we don't stand up for our progressive values, no one else will. If we don't hold Tony Abbott to account for his views, they'll go unchallenged right through to election day -- when, according to today's polls, he will become our next Prime Minister. Click here to see our latest ad, featuring his views and spoken by GetUp members: 

www.getup.org.au/distortedvalues 

Every week Tony Abbott makes another comment that reveals very concerning social views. Commentators blow them off as "gaffes", but this isn't about gaffes. It's about values. 

It's about our national character if our Prime Minister labels refugees who seek our help as "illegal", even as they exercise their legal, human right to flee danger. 

It's about the message we send to young gay and lesbian Australians, if our Prime Minister talks about their equality as a "passing fashion," and what that does to their self-esteem. 

It's about our values if a Prime Minister talks to "the housewives of Australia as they're doing their ironing," says his colleagues are "not just a pretty face" and have "sex appeal" and calls on his opponent to "make an honest woman of herself". 

Prime Ministers reflect our national values, and have the power to change them radically. Does what Tony Abbott says matter? Well, in 17 days he wants to be speaking for all of us. Click here to watch the new ad featuring GetUp members: 

www.getup.org.au/distortedvalues 

Together last election, we raised over $300,000 to put a similar version of this ad on air. It was called "the most effective ad of the election." Let's chip in again, and take this updated ad even further. 

Let's not let Tony Abbott's views on social values, and issues affecting women go unexamined and unchallenged. We've had too many people like Kathy asking "how are we letting him get away with this?" And too many men like me wondering what we can do, because we're fed up with people thinking Tony Abbott speaks for Australian men. Whatever your story, let's make sure he knows that he doesn't speak for us. 

Let's speak up, 

Sam for the GetUp team.

Friday, 28 June 2013

I'm back - the bad movie sequel

 Remember the fanfare of the premier of Kevin 07 that had a tragic ending at the hands of Julia Gillard who in turn went on with her own movie 'Moving forward' which had a plot that moved in aimless circles and went nowhere at the box office.

  
                                                                                                                   
Cartoons by Roy and Jon Kudelka




 Anthony Ackroyd  foretold of the coming sequel when he made this youtube back in August 2010







Tony Abbott as opposition leader may well have felt redundant with the continual self destruction within the Gillard Labor government  and Kevin Rudd always on the wings awaiting to take over as the lead act.

Both cartoons by Nicholson.


 Cartoon by Bill Moir





Both cartoons by Warren Brown




Paul Zanetti (above) and Warren Brown (below) came up with simular views about the same old rubbish no matter who was Prime Minister



 




And finally the last word goes to Zeg 

Wednesday, 13 March 2013

The War on the West - Creeping Communism


The War on the West - Part 2 Agenda 21.


This Post is in two halves. 

Both based on the works of Dr Amy McGrath OAM.

Part 1 The Frauding of Votes(link to Part 1)

Part 2 The Fabian Societies and Agenda 21.

Dr Amy McGRATH, OAM, JP was educated at Telopea Park High School, Canberra and at Sydney University (BA Hons; MA; PhD, 1975). In 1970 and 1971 she travelled to the USA and the UK, respectively, on U.S. State Department and British Council grants, and in 1996 became the founding convenor of the H S Chapman Society, a body established to raise public awareness of the prevalence of electoral fraud in Australia.

Dr Amy’s latest book is about the “Communism by Stealth" organisation the Fabian Society titled "Wolves in Sheep's Clothing" and is available from, Tower Books, PO Box 737, Post Office Kensington, NSW 2033 for $10 plus $5 postage. (or on-line in pdf form - link)

Dr Amy McGrath's latest book is a revelation of Fabianism, George Soros, The Club of Rome, GetUp and Agenda 21. It reveals the plan to use Creeping Communism to take over the World and lead to One World Government. The New World Order Observer wrote on September 3, 2009
CREEPING COMMUNISM

The Fabian Society, along with other Secret Societies, work together for the ‘Common Purpose’ of a New World Order... We see this consistently, with denial and delay tactics used in response to complaints by the people and the lies, omissions and twisted truths that spin doctors play to the public in the mass media.  
At the beginning:
It is now 1884 and we find ourselves in Surrey, England observing a small group of these Fabians, sitting around a table in the stylish home of two of their more prominent members, Sydney and Beatrice Webb. The Webbs would be known world-wide as the founders of the London School of Economics. Their home eventually was donated to the Fabian Society and became its official headquarters. Around the table are such well-known figures as George Bernard Shaw, Arnold Toynbee, H.G. Wells and numerous others of similar caliber. The Fabian Society still exists, and many prominent people are members, not the least of which is England’s Ex-Prime Minister, Tony Blair.
Australia has had five successive Fabian Prime Ministers since 1970 – Gough Whitlam, Robert Hawke, Paul Keating, Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard plus various deputies.

Why Fabians? The movement is named  The Fabian Society because they favoured gradual change rather than revolutionary change and was named  in honour of the Roman general Fabius Maximus (nicknamed "Cunctator", meaning "the Delayer"). His Fabian strategy advocated tactics of harassment and attrition rather than head-on battles against the Carthaginian army under the renowned general Hannibal.  (Wikipedia)
Fabians are, according to their own symbolism, Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing, and their style is more effective in countries where parliamentary traditions are well established and where people expect to have a voice in their own political destiny. Leninists on the other hand, tend to be Wolves in Wolves’ Clothing and their style is more effective in countries where parliamentary traditions are weak, and where people are used to dictatorships anyway.
Were the Fabians humanitarian?
To give you an idea of the type of world these people would like to “remould” here is a quote from George Bernard Shaw:
“Under Socialism, you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner (my emphasis), but whilst you were permitted to live, you would have to live well. In the ultimate ‘nanny State’, with no free will or right to choose, you are owned by the elites and discarded when you are no longer any use.”

As mentioned above, the Webbs were founders of the London School of Economics.
Fabian Society members not only founded the London School of Economics but also the International Court of Justice at the Hague and were largely involved in the creation of the UN and the League of Nations. They are very strong advocates for the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) pseudoscience (my emphasis) because they are the types of people who have hijacked the environmental movement in order to use it to their political advantage. Their intent is to use environmental issues as a means to cause people to unite and demand that the issues be fixed, intending us to demand a global government that has the authority to ‘fix’ global warming because sovereign national governments lack that ability.
The UN’s Agenda 21 is an example of a Fabian Society program that sets international requirements of how people must live, learn, travel, eat and communicate. its sole purpose is control of people, not protection of the environment.
What is Agenda 21?


Agenda 21 is an action plan of the United Nations (UN) related to
sustainable development and was an outcome of the United Nations
Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio
de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. It is a comprehensive blueprint of an action
to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organisations of the UN,
governments and major groups in every area in which humans directly
affect the environment. 
Development of Agenda 21 – 1992
The full text of Agenda 21 was revealed at the Rio de Janiero United
Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit)
held in Rio de Janeiro on June 13, 1992 where 178 governments
voted to adopt the program. The final text was the result of drafting, consultation and negotiation culminating at the two-week conference. 
The number 21 refers to an Agenda for the 21st century.
DR McGrath quotes an item in Town Hall Magazine (July 7, 2011) by Rachel Alexander:
....The UN has mostly bypassed national governments, using the adoption by Agent 21 of an international Council of Local Environmental initiatives (lCLEI) to make agreements directly with local governments. ICLEI’s presence has grown to include agreements with over 600 cities, towns and counties here, which are now copying the land use plans prescribed in Agenda 21. Some conservatives are trying to attract attention to Agenda 21 by labeling it as a secret conspiracy to create a one world government.
While that will wake some people up, it will turn off others. 
Agenda 21 seeks to promote “sustainability”, the latest revised word for “environmentalism” since Americans have learned too many negative things about it. 
“Sustainability” is just an amorphous concept that can be interpreted to an extreme degree that would regulate and restrict many parts of our lives. When will the level of carbon emissions be low enough? How much must we reduce our consumption of fossil fuels? 
Preserving the environment is a dubious science and what steps are really necessary to protect the environment are anybody’s guess.
!n 1995, Australia issued a report to the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (UNSCD)
Implementation of Agenda 21
 Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts

Foreword by Prime Minister Keating
As the pressures on world resources continue to grow, the concept
of Sustainable Development becomes an imperative for the global
community. Australia is proud to present its second report to the
Commission of Sustainable Development. This details our nation’s effort
toward implementing Agenda 21. 

 WHO STARTED IT?

Journalist Jim Ball had no doubt that Maurice Strong was culpable in an interview with Australia’s renowned 2GB radio host Alan Jones. “He very deliberately did it. He set up the un Environment Program, and then he worked through that with the World Meteorological organisation (WMO) and the international Program of Climate Change (iPCC) was set up by them. That meant that every government weather agency around the world was involved in the IPCC. They appoint the scientists that they want to be on it, and they also of course provide the funding. That has meant that the funding has only got to one side of the debate. Strong knew that. This is why he organised it through the WMO.

AGENDA 21
the Greatest Fraud perpetrated on mankind 
By Vivienne Skeen

I have been researching Agenda 21 since I first became aware of its existence in 2010. I do not profess to be an expert on Agenda 21, but what I have discovered has exceeded all my worst fears. Agenda 21 is nothing more than world government, world domination and the end of all freedom for all mankind.

My biggest concern is that the public are asleep on this, as I was, until one of my sons asked me if I had heard of Agenda 21. Agenda 21 is the ‘United Nations Sustainable Development Agenda 21’ that is taking over Australia, as it is every other nation in the entire world.



Links: UNEP - Agenda 21 Pages (link)
Michael McLaren speaks with Dr. Amy McGrath on 2GB (link)

Agenda 21 for Dummies: