Showing posts with label Agenda 21. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Agenda 21. Show all posts

Monday, 30 December 2013

Holy Cow! Another Global Warming Myth busted.

(Originally published on Australian Climate Sceptics blog)

The word “Sustainability” has been hijacked with definitions developed by groups pushing various agendas including being used extensively to promote the Agenda 21 agenda to a point that we need to be wary of the use of the word.


Having said that, here is a pre-Christmas story from 


Cows’ Role in Global Warming Overlooked in Climate Talks
Cattle and other ruminants are probably the biggest human-related source of methane, a gas adding to global warming, and climate negotiators have paid too little attention to livestock, a team of researchers said. 
Cows, sheep, goats and buffalo produce “copious amounts” of methane in their digestive systems, Oregon State University wrote in an online press release, citing analysis published in the journal Nature Climate Change today. One of the most effective ways to cut the gas would be to reduce the global population of ruminant livestock, the university said.
Yet there is a multitude (or should I say a stampede?) of information contradicting this. Googling "cattle carbon neutral" brings around a quarter million hits. E.G:-

US Grasslands Carbon Neutral: (The Land)
Cattle grazing systems on native grassland in the northern United States are reducing greenhouse gases, a new study reports. 
The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) researchers set out to get a local perspective on European conclusions that managed grasslands are greenhouse gas sinks—(although when methane and nitrous oxide emissions were taken into account, the greenhouse gas balance in the European sites was closer to neutral). 
The USDA study, reported this week in the Journal of Environmental Quality, came to a mixed conclusion. 
It confirmed that in the North Dakota study area, all grazing treatments sequestered significant quantities of carbon and minor quantities of atmospheric methane.


Climate breakthrough: cattle carbon neutral: (Qld Country Life)

A NEW report which shows that Queensland's cattle grazing industry is already all but carbon neutral and could provide a solution in addressing the State's overall carbon liability has been buried by the Bligh Government. 
It is understood the release of the 30-page report prepared by Queensland Primary Industries and Fisheries has been derailed by Greg Withers, the Director-General of the Queensland Government's Department of Climate Change and Premier Anna Bligh's husband. 
The report, which examines the carbon footprint of the beef industry and the impact of vegetation clearing bans, has been peer reviewed by a number of the nation's top scientists, including the CSIRO's Dr Ed Charmley, QUT's Dr Peter Grace, and Meat and Livestock Australia's Beverly Henry. 
The authors of the report - titled Net Carbon Position of the Queensland Beef Industry - are respected QPIF scientists Dr Steven Bray and Dr Jacqui Wilcocks.
Ruminants not Kyoto villains  (link: pdf)


A Paper by Dr Gerrit van der Lingen published by the NZ Climate Science Coalition.  (NZCSC)
The New Zealand Government signed the Kyoto protocol on 22 May 1998 and ratified it on 19 December 2002. 
Perhaps there was some justification in 2002 before the bottom fell out of the falsified AGW hypothesis. (See also UK Met OfficeJo Nova)
All plants, including grass, require carbon dioxide to grow. Grass is eaten by ruminants and the carbon in it is used for the growth of the animal and for milk and wool production. A small part of the carbon from the grass is used to make methane through enteric fermentation. This methane is emitted by the animals into the atmosphere. It stays in the atmosphere for only about 10 years, after which it changes back to carbon dioxide, which in turn is being absorbed by the grass, which in turn is eaten by the animals, etc. It is basically a closed loop. However, some of the carbon is incorporated by the animals into skin, wool, meat and bones. Some of those are subsequently turned into durable animal-based commodities, such as woollen garments, leather products, even bone carvings. As long as such products are not incinerated, the carbon stays locked up. It is being sequestered.  
Consequently, ruminants act as carbon sinks. There is therefore no justification to include ruminant methane emissions in the Kyoto Protocol obligations.

Do the Alarmists check both sides of the debate or just go ahead and publish already busted alarm stories?

Wednesday, 4 September 2013

Pauline Hanson talks of water and Agenda 21



Pauline Hanson and Peter Manuel from FLAG Australia (Incorporated) discuss Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development Bureaucracy that is affecting the food bowl of Australia and in particular South Australia under the NRMA Act 2004.

Peter, on the Food Producers Landowners Action Group (FLAG) site writes:
What an absolute privilege to be on stage with Pauline and hear her speak from the heart about Agenda 21 and the privatisation of our water and the restrictions that are being forced upon us farmers by the environmental movement which make it so difficult to supply this great country with a clean healthy food product.

Pauline came to South Australia after a phone call I made to her a few weeks ago in regards to Natural Resource Management issues that control the way we run our freehold land and the uphill battle we have to grow food.  Pauline did not hesitate and took time out from her very busy campaigning schedule to come and speak and answer any questions thrown at her.

In the short time I had with Pauline it was very obvious that most that has been written about her over the years in regards to being a conspiracy theorist and racist is absolute rubbish.  She is far from a racist, highly intelligent and what you see is what you get.  She certainly wouldn’t do any dirty deals behind closed doors if she was fortunate enough to be elected into Parliament.

Wednesday, 20 March 2013

Lord Monckton at Parramatta, Sydney tonight.


Reminding people in the Sydney area that Lord Christopher Monckton will be at Parramatta Town Hall tonight from 7pm, exposing the flaws behind the Global Warming Hoax and Agenda 21.


Lord Monckton is sponsored by the NO CARBON TAX Climate Sceptics Party.

http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/lord-monckton-exposes-angenda-21-and.html

Wednesday, 13 March 2013

The War on the West - Creeping Communism


The War on the West - Part 2 Agenda 21.


This Post is in two halves. 

Both based on the works of Dr Amy McGrath OAM.

Part 1 The Frauding of Votes(link to Part 1)

Part 2 The Fabian Societies and Agenda 21.

Dr Amy McGRATH, OAM, JP was educated at Telopea Park High School, Canberra and at Sydney University (BA Hons; MA; PhD, 1975). In 1970 and 1971 she travelled to the USA and the UK, respectively, on U.S. State Department and British Council grants, and in 1996 became the founding convenor of the H S Chapman Society, a body established to raise public awareness of the prevalence of electoral fraud in Australia.

Dr Amy’s latest book is about the “Communism by Stealth" organisation the Fabian Society titled "Wolves in Sheep's Clothing" and is available from, Tower Books, PO Box 737, Post Office Kensington, NSW 2033 for $10 plus $5 postage. (or on-line in pdf form - link)

Dr Amy McGrath's latest book is a revelation of Fabianism, George Soros, The Club of Rome, GetUp and Agenda 21. It reveals the plan to use Creeping Communism to take over the World and lead to One World Government. The New World Order Observer wrote on September 3, 2009
CREEPING COMMUNISM

The Fabian Society, along with other Secret Societies, work together for the ‘Common Purpose’ of a New World Order... We see this consistently, with denial and delay tactics used in response to complaints by the people and the lies, omissions and twisted truths that spin doctors play to the public in the mass media.  
At the beginning:
It is now 1884 and we find ourselves in Surrey, England observing a small group of these Fabians, sitting around a table in the stylish home of two of their more prominent members, Sydney and Beatrice Webb. The Webbs would be known world-wide as the founders of the London School of Economics. Their home eventually was donated to the Fabian Society and became its official headquarters. Around the table are such well-known figures as George Bernard Shaw, Arnold Toynbee, H.G. Wells and numerous others of similar caliber. The Fabian Society still exists, and many prominent people are members, not the least of which is England’s Ex-Prime Minister, Tony Blair.
Australia has had five successive Fabian Prime Ministers since 1970 – Gough Whitlam, Robert Hawke, Paul Keating, Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard plus various deputies.

Why Fabians? The movement is named  The Fabian Society because they favoured gradual change rather than revolutionary change and was named  in honour of the Roman general Fabius Maximus (nicknamed "Cunctator", meaning "the Delayer"). His Fabian strategy advocated tactics of harassment and attrition rather than head-on battles against the Carthaginian army under the renowned general Hannibal.  (Wikipedia)
Fabians are, according to their own symbolism, Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing, and their style is more effective in countries where parliamentary traditions are well established and where people expect to have a voice in their own political destiny. Leninists on the other hand, tend to be Wolves in Wolves’ Clothing and their style is more effective in countries where parliamentary traditions are weak, and where people are used to dictatorships anyway.
Were the Fabians humanitarian?
To give you an idea of the type of world these people would like to “remould” here is a quote from George Bernard Shaw:
“Under Socialism, you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner (my emphasis), but whilst you were permitted to live, you would have to live well. In the ultimate ‘nanny State’, with no free will or right to choose, you are owned by the elites and discarded when you are no longer any use.”

As mentioned above, the Webbs were founders of the London School of Economics.
Fabian Society members not only founded the London School of Economics but also the International Court of Justice at the Hague and were largely involved in the creation of the UN and the League of Nations. They are very strong advocates for the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) pseudoscience (my emphasis) because they are the types of people who have hijacked the environmental movement in order to use it to their political advantage. Their intent is to use environmental issues as a means to cause people to unite and demand that the issues be fixed, intending us to demand a global government that has the authority to ‘fix’ global warming because sovereign national governments lack that ability.
The UN’s Agenda 21 is an example of a Fabian Society program that sets international requirements of how people must live, learn, travel, eat and communicate. its sole purpose is control of people, not protection of the environment.
What is Agenda 21?


Agenda 21 is an action plan of the United Nations (UN) related to
sustainable development and was an outcome of the United Nations
Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Rio
de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992. It is a comprehensive blueprint of an action
to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organisations of the UN,
governments and major groups in every area in which humans directly
affect the environment. 
Development of Agenda 21 – 1992
The full text of Agenda 21 was revealed at the Rio de Janiero United
Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Earth Summit)
held in Rio de Janeiro on June 13, 1992 where 178 governments
voted to adopt the program. The final text was the result of drafting, consultation and negotiation culminating at the two-week conference. 
The number 21 refers to an Agenda for the 21st century.
DR McGrath quotes an item in Town Hall Magazine (July 7, 2011) by Rachel Alexander:
....The UN has mostly bypassed national governments, using the adoption by Agent 21 of an international Council of Local Environmental initiatives (lCLEI) to make agreements directly with local governments. ICLEI’s presence has grown to include agreements with over 600 cities, towns and counties here, which are now copying the land use plans prescribed in Agenda 21. Some conservatives are trying to attract attention to Agenda 21 by labeling it as a secret conspiracy to create a one world government.
While that will wake some people up, it will turn off others. 
Agenda 21 seeks to promote “sustainability”, the latest revised word for “environmentalism” since Americans have learned too many negative things about it. 
“Sustainability” is just an amorphous concept that can be interpreted to an extreme degree that would regulate and restrict many parts of our lives. When will the level of carbon emissions be low enough? How much must we reduce our consumption of fossil fuels? 
Preserving the environment is a dubious science and what steps are really necessary to protect the environment are anybody’s guess.
!n 1995, Australia issued a report to the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (UNSCD)
Implementation of Agenda 21
 Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts

Foreword by Prime Minister Keating
As the pressures on world resources continue to grow, the concept
of Sustainable Development becomes an imperative for the global
community. Australia is proud to present its second report to the
Commission of Sustainable Development. This details our nation’s effort
toward implementing Agenda 21. 

 WHO STARTED IT?

Journalist Jim Ball had no doubt that Maurice Strong was culpable in an interview with Australia’s renowned 2GB radio host Alan Jones. “He very deliberately did it. He set up the un Environment Program, and then he worked through that with the World Meteorological organisation (WMO) and the international Program of Climate Change (iPCC) was set up by them. That meant that every government weather agency around the world was involved in the IPCC. They appoint the scientists that they want to be on it, and they also of course provide the funding. That has meant that the funding has only got to one side of the debate. Strong knew that. This is why he organised it through the WMO.

AGENDA 21
the Greatest Fraud perpetrated on mankind 
By Vivienne Skeen

I have been researching Agenda 21 since I first became aware of its existence in 2010. I do not profess to be an expert on Agenda 21, but what I have discovered has exceeded all my worst fears. Agenda 21 is nothing more than world government, world domination and the end of all freedom for all mankind.

My biggest concern is that the public are asleep on this, as I was, until one of my sons asked me if I had heard of Agenda 21. Agenda 21 is the ‘United Nations Sustainable Development Agenda 21’ that is taking over Australia, as it is every other nation in the entire world.



Links: UNEP - Agenda 21 Pages (link)
Michael McLaren speaks with Dr. Amy McGrath on 2GB (link)

Agenda 21 for Dummies: