Wednesday, 31 July 2013

PRA: CSG companies $5 million advantage

Five million is the figure that the CSG companies & their industry lobby group APPEA are throwing into a campaign called, ‘Our Natural Advantage’. Apparently gaining that ‘social licence’ for the CSG industry to operate is $5,000,000 important. Perhaps those of us defending landowner’s rights and the future of food production should regard this campaign as a compliment that our many volunteer hours have to be countered by the natural advantage of the multinational companies many millions.
 On reading articles in various urban outlets some are making an attempt to be even-handed about the CSG issue. However last Saturdays  opinion article in the Queensland-based News Limited newspaper, Rivalries set aside as beef, wheat and gas prosper on the Downs, can only be classed as propaganda.
The ‘Our Natural Advantage’ campaign sells the availability of plentiful high paying jobs. It earnestly relates that people living in the gasfields are very happy with the situation and it is only a small vocal minority of outside ideological activists creating misinformation. An imaginative interpretation of the Underground Water Impact report is used to give assurance that science is on the side of the CSG industry.   The appalling and inaccurate old chestnut is used that because in excess of 3,000 contracts have been signed farmers are content with their lot.

These arguments were proclaimed at the May APPEA conference. In the Queensland Country Life article, Landholder response to APPEA conference, David Hamilton of Basin Sustainability Alliance and lawyers Peter Shannon and Tom Marland gave resounding evidence to the contrary.

In another QCL report of the same conference, Coexistence relies on respect, the Gasfield Commissioner, John Cotter said. "Respect, trust and communication are the foundation stones of this industry's social licence to operate and ultimately its future."   The CSG industry’s latest communication and lack of respect in this campaign will hardly engender trust with landowners.

This week it was reported in the farmonline article, Doubling ag output - with CSG's help, John Cotter  telling a recent Brisbane Forum, “some genuine cross sector opportunities between food and energy were yet to be fully realised” and that “those opportunities could only be achieved with community trust allowing for ‘sustainable coexistence’.”   

Such trust can only be achieved with greater honesty and research replacing PR campaigns. Landowners are genuinely worried about future quantity and quality of underground water. Some will be affected. Concerns will be only be put to rest by science and generous compensation of affected businesses. Genuine concern must not be waved aside as alarmism.

The above article was also submitted as a letter to the editor to the Queensland Country Life.

Previous related post
Learn the realities for landowners when a CSG company wishes to establish their business over the top of your farming business in Richard Golden's presentation at the 2013 10th Anniversary Property Rights Australia conference. - Living and Working in a Gasfield



  1. The CSG companies campaign does cover a couple of more issues not covered in the post above. One is the amount of 'green tape', environmental codes that they have to comply with on a project. This is reasonably complex issue & needs a post of its own to be able to cover it. Some environmental requirements also work against landowners for example the shear size and complexity of Environmental Impact Statements.(EIS's)

    The 'Our Natural Advantage' campaign is also raising the issue of how agricultural activity is "thriving" on CSG company OWNED land.
    I don't know of where this issue has been brought up before now; this could be a preventive PR move on behalf of the companies. And well that they may feel concern that the heat may be put on the amount of land that they have taken away from agricultural professionals.
    For the developing QGC gas field at Woleebee, west of Wandoan, QGC have purchased 5 properties that have an area of roughly 15,500 ha.

    This is a link to a QGC media release that has enough spin to leave you feeling dizzy.

  2. Good article, Dale. It reminds me of a DEHP report released last week finding again that the prolonged fish disease in Gladstone Harbour was due to the floods in late 2010- early '11, not the dredging. What else would a government department investigating the activities of a government-owned corporation (Gladstone Ports Corporation) say, with billions of dollars at stake?

  3. The 5 million dollar campaign continues with APPEA issuing a series of media releases. It appears that in politics & lobbying that you don't worry about if you are stretching the truth; just keep on repeating the message.

    Two media releases from APPEA have been in the press so far this week the first uses the old furphy that because landowners have sign contracts, everyone is happy. See, CSG companies get more than 4000 land access agreements signed

    NSW ‘dragging its heels’ on coal seam gas activities is a different take. It feeds on interstate rivalry. NSW can’t lose another State of origin. Better hurry up quick to race ahead of Qld.
    CSG has always been treated as a race but has anyone asked a race to where?


Welcome to a place that has a focus (but not exclusively) on regional and rural Australia open for anyone living anywhere to read, learn and interact. Please feel free to make a comment.

You can use some HTML codes such as, a for active; b for bold; i for italics

Active code - substitute a for @
<@ href="web address">linked words

[Click Here] for a link to another site where there is a very good simple explanation.